David and the Philistine 1 Samuel 17Few Bible stories have gripped the popular imagination as has the story of David and Goliathalas, totally wrongly. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
A David and Goliath situation has the small and powerless facing and overcoming the big and powerful. Great stuff, but not the stuff of the Bible story.
The story of David and the Philistine championGoliath
is used twice, the Philistine some thirty timesis about
trust in God, certainly, but about that sort of trust in God that enables
us to do what we have the capacities and abilities to do.
We should not underestimate David. He may have been the youngest son
and a good-looking redhead; so is many a hefty hunk. Saul says to him,
you are just a boy (17:33). It sounds conclusive, but it is
a shocking example of mistranslation. The same Hebrew word (boy/youth)
is used of all Jesses sons in 16:11Are all your sons
here?as we might say, Are all the boys here?when
they range in age from twenty to forty. The three eldest of Jesses
sons were serving in Sauls army (17:13). Nothing so far to suggest
that David was barred by age or size.
Davids own description of himself is worth scrutiny. He says that,
when he was a shepherd, if a lion or bear took a lamb from the flock,
he would go after it, strike it and rescue the lamb from its mouth, and
if it turned on him he would grab it by the jaw, strike it and kill it
(17:34-35).
Hed catch it, so he was fast. Hed strike it and get the lamb
back, so he had courage. If attacked, hed grab it by the jaw and
kill it, so he was not only tough and ruthless but had very good reflexes.
This is no small, apparently defenceless shepherd boy.
We should not underestimate Davids weapon. The sling was a standard
military weapon (see 2 Kings 3:25 and 2 Chronicles 26:14); the sling was
a very accurate weapon (see Judges 20:16). This is no schoolboys
slingshot or catapult; it played the same role in the ancient world as
the English longbow against the French cavalry, or the Molotov cocktail
against the German tank. In hand-to-hand combat, the giant Philistine
was probably unbeatable; at a distance, the sling was the ideal weapon
to take him outespecially if his armour-bearer was still holding
his shield (17:41).
All David had to do was to get within range and not miss. He knew he
could do it, as long as he didnt lose his nerve and mess up. He
could stumble and fall in the approach run; he could miss with his first
shot and he probably would not get a second one. So he put his trust in
God all right and he did what he knew he could do. The Philistine ended
up dead.
Far better than having God help the hopeless, the story has God help
those who need encouragement and support to do what they can doif
they are game to take the risk.
Incidentally, there are two stories in 1 Samuel 17 about this single
combat between David and the Philistine. Both are in the Hebrew text;
only one is in the Greek. In the second one, David is ambitious and trust
in God takes a back seat. What shall be done for the man who kills
this Philistine? (17:26). Money, a royal daughter in marriage, and
tax-free status for the family.
Ambition and faith. No harm in combining them both.












